Regarding enterotoxic colibacillosis of ETEC, which statement is true?

Prepare for the Alimentary Bacteriology Test. Utilize flashcards and multiple choice questions, complete with hints and explanations. Ensure your success on the exam!

Multiple Choice

Regarding enterotoxic colibacillosis of ETEC, which statement is true?

Explanation:
ETEC causes illness by first attaching to the small-intestinal mucosa with fimbrial colonization factors, establishing colonization, and then releasing enterotoxins. This sequence—colonization of the intestine followed by toxin production—explains why the statement that oral infection leads to colonization followed by toxin production is true. The toxins (heat-labile and heat-stable) disrupt ion transport in enterocytes, triggering watery, secretory diarrhea. Because ETEC is noninvasive, it does not invade the mucosa or cause ulceration, so a claim about deep mucosal invasion is incorrect. It also causes secretory diarrhea, so denying secretory diarrhea is false. Disease is not limited to adults due to receptor timing; ETEC commonly affects travelers and young children across ages.

ETEC causes illness by first attaching to the small-intestinal mucosa with fimbrial colonization factors, establishing colonization, and then releasing enterotoxins. This sequence—colonization of the intestine followed by toxin production—explains why the statement that oral infection leads to colonization followed by toxin production is true. The toxins (heat-labile and heat-stable) disrupt ion transport in enterocytes, triggering watery, secretory diarrhea. Because ETEC is noninvasive, it does not invade the mucosa or cause ulceration, so a claim about deep mucosal invasion is incorrect. It also causes secretory diarrhea, so denying secretory diarrhea is false. Disease is not limited to adults due to receptor timing; ETEC commonly affects travelers and young children across ages.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy